About criminal responsabily:

Reconstruction and systematization of it theorical-conceptual meanings in the fiel of criminology

Abstract

Criminal responsability is a structural concept within criminology. However, the discursive formulation that supports this concept admits different logics and contents. It is relevant to carry out a systematization and review construct according to its various enunciation contexts, considering the heavy theoretical and institutional consequences that emerge from its conceptualization. Then, this work aims to identiy the various theoretical-conceptual meanings that criminal responsability asumes in referential discourses of criminology such as that of the classical school, the positive school, the new criminology, applied criminology and legal psychology associated with the clinical function of law. The Works presentes a descriptive and interpretive design. The research categories will be exclusively qualitative in scope, while the procedures will consist of the survey of secondary sources and the bibliographic review. It is concluded that criminal responsibility will assume different statutes according to the gravity and conceptualization of the elements that comprise it: the criminal reaction, the criminal act and the author of said act. In this way, responsibility may be known as moral, social, judicial or subjective responsibility. However, from the exposed survey, it is possible to extract a recurring element: the ostracism to which the subjective dimension is compelled, which places legal psychology in a position to recover and preserve that dimension so that the penalty is not degraded to the logic of the punishment.